Ratcliffe walked a fine line before the Senate Intelligence Committee, at the chamber’s first hearing under new social distancing guidelines, between pledging to be transparent and unbiased with intelligence delivered both to the President and Congress and not wading too deeply into the controversies surrounding Trump and the intelligence community.
He faced questions from both Democrats and Republicans on whether he would provide unbiased intelligence to a President who might not want to hear it — and whether Trump requested loyalty when he agreed to be selected for the role a second time earlier this year, following his initial withdrawal from consideration last year amid questions about exaggerations to his resume. Ratcliffe said Trump had not asked him for loyalty.
“Whether you are talking about the President, whether you are talking about Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell — anyone’s views on what they want the intelligence to be will never impact the intelligence that I deliver. Never,” Ratcliffe said in response to a question from Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a key Republican on the panel.
If confirmed as director of national intelligence, Ratcliffe would lead the 17 agencies that make up the intelligence community as head of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which was created in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Ratcliffe has been prepping for Tuesday’s confirmation hearing at ODNI and has met with agency heads to get their perspectives.
‘All roads lead to China’
Ratcliffe said if he was confirmed, his primary focus for the intelligence community would be on the impact of coronavirus as well as questions about its origins in Wuhan, China.
“If confirmed the intelligence community will be laser focused on getting all of the answers that we can regarding how this happened, when this happened, and I commit to providing with as much transparency to you as the law will allow and with due regard for sources and methods,” Ratcliffe said.
Ratcliffe said that he views China as the “greatest threat actor” to the United States right now, citing China’s role in the coronavirus outbreak along with cybersecurity issues. “All roads lead to China,” he said.
Ratcliffe faced questions from senators in both parties about the virus’ origins, which has become a politically charged issue after Trump said he had seen evidence giving him a “high degree of confidence” the virus originated in a lab. Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, asked him if he’d seen evidence it originated in a lab. Ratcliffe said he had not. Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, then asked Ratcliffe if he’d seen evidence the virus originated in a Wuhan market. He also said he had not.
Ratcliffe noted Tuesday, however, that it had “been a while” since he’d received a classified coronavirus briefing as a member of the House Intelligence Committee because Congress has been out of session due to coronavirus.
King said that he raised the issue because he was concerned about “conclusion shopping” with the intelligence community.
“That’s where it worries me that the President apparently has been pressing the intelligence community to find what he wants to find,” King said. “The question should be, ‘Where did the virus come from?’ not ‘Don’t you think it came from a lab?’ … Because if they taint the intelligence before it gets to them, they’re going to make bad decisions.”
Ratcliffe responded that he shared King’s sentiment generally on the politicization of intelligence.
“I can’t comment on things that haven’t happened yet … I think I’ve been very clear, what anyone wants the intelligence to say, wont impact the intelligence from me, what I deliver,” Ratcliffe said.
Ratcliffe steers clear of Trump intel controversies
But Ratcliffe declined to weigh in on several of Trump’s controversies with the intelligence community, from his unwillingness to accept their finding that Russia was trying to help him in the 2016 election to the firing of several senior intelligence officials, including former IC inspector general Michael Atkinson, who notified Congress of the Ukraine whistleblower complaint that ultimately sparked Trump’s impeachment.
Asked about the firing, Ratcliffe said he wasn’t familiar enough with the Justice Department’s legal opinion on whether the whistleblower complaint met the legal requirement for notifying Congress. “That’s a legal question that I don’t know the answer to,” Ratcliffe said.
And Ratcliffe declined to answer a question from Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, about whether he agreed with the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report that corroborated the intelligence community assessment Russia was trying to help Trump in 2017, when the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee disputed that finding in 2018.
“I respect both committees, but I have not seen the underlying intelligence to tell me why there is a difference of opinion between the two committees,” Ratcliffe said.
Ratcliffe looks to have the support he needs from Republicans who were skeptical the first time he was picked, but Democrats pressed him Tuesday on his ability to be independent from Trump’s open distrust of the intelligence community.
Warner said he had concerns about what he described as Ratcliffe’s “inexperience, partisanship, and past statements that seemed to embellish” his record.
“Some have suggested that your main qualification for confirmation to this post is that you are not Ambassador Grenell. But frankly, that is not enough,” Warner said in his opening statement. “Before we put the Senate’s stamp of approval and confirm a nominee to this critical position, senators must demand the qualities that the Senate specified when it passed the law creating the ODNI.”
Ratcliffe pledged in his opening statement to deliver unbiased intelligence to the President and Congress.
“Let me be very clear. Regardless of what anyone wants our intelligence to reflect, the intelligence I will provide, if confirmed, will not be impacted or altered as a result of outside influence. Above all, my fidelity and loyalty will always be with the Constitution and the rule of law, and my actions as DNI will reflect that commitment,” Ratcliffe said in the opening statement.
First Senate hearing with social distancing
Ratcliffe’s confirmation hearing is the first Senate hearing being held since the Senate reconvened this week in a new, socially distant world at the US Capitol. The hearing remains closed to the public, and the number of Senate aides and reporters has been curtailed. Senators rotated into the hearing in small groups for half-hour blocks in order to limit the number in the room at one time.
A nominee’s family members are nearly always in attendance for confirmation hearings, but Ratcliffe’s were not present on Tuesday. Ratcliffe was supposed to be introduced by former Attorney General in the George W. Bush administration, John Ashcroft. Instead, Senate Intelligence member Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, read excerpts of Ashcroft’s planned statement.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican who was cool to Ratcliffe’s nomination last year, said after Ratcliffe was nominated a second time this year that he would support the pick. In a sign of the bipartisan concern about Trump’s treatment of intelligence officials and the firing of Atkinson, Burr’s first question asked Ratcliffe generally about the importance of the intelligence community’s inspector general.
“Given your experience as a member of House Intelligence Committee, we expect you to lead the intelligence community with integrity, serve as a forceful advocate for the professionals in the intelligence community and ensure that the intel enterprise operates lawfully ethically and morally,” Burr said in his opening statement.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, presented Ratcliffe with his statements made during the House’s impeachment hearings last year on the Ukraine whistleblower, who came under attack by the President and his allies in Congress.
Ratcliffe responded that he didn’t want to “relitigate” the impeachment inquiry.
“My issue was not with the whistleblower, my issue was with what I saw as a lack of due process in the House process,” he said.
Ratcliffe was later pressed by Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, to commit unequivocally to submit credible whistleblower complaints to Congress, a question stemming from the fight over the Ukraine whistleblower report last year.
“You want to have it both ways,” Wyden said after Ratcliffe said he would follow the law. “You want to try to portray yourself as a defender of the Constitution and then you water it down with the specifics.”
This story has been updated with additional developments and will update throughout the day Tuesday.
CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, Manu Raju, Alison Main, Michael Conte, Jamie Crawford, Alex Marquardt and Kylie Atwood contributed to this report.